( NON-PROFIT )

ESPAÑOL

Mexican Air Force
FLIR's video lights are not UFO's
they are oil well gas flames!
PART II
(updated may 2008)


Mexican Air Force C-26 Merlin aircraft


Burning gas flares at NOHOCH-A oil platform
located in the CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX 
     Video caption from FLIR STAR SAFIRE II video lights
     CAMERA WAS AIMING TOWARD CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX

Mexican Air Force specialists were incapable to discover that the FLIR lights source was
the Cantarell oil well flames that burn off on daily basis in the Gulf of México and wrongly
released to Jaime Maussan, a well-known Mexican broadcaster and UFOlogist who has
made a career out of the sensationalist promotion of supposedly "unexplained mysteries.
" Maussan's pronouncements range from the sensational to the absurd.

We are very glad to present here all the evidence and the material that was very hard to
get in some part and we hope you can understand all the examples, charts and graphics.
If you have any comments or questions including critics we appreciate your interest

Please don't hesitate writing to us at any time and we will be glad to answer your posts

Cap. Alejandro Franz
director@alcione.org
webmaster@alcione.org
ALCIONE.ORG
non-profit


 
SOME NEWS

Mexican Airforce UFO Encounter

FOX News Mexican Air Force - CNN Headline News

http://ufo-media.com/index.php?option=com_seyret&task=videodirectlink&id=1240

05/11/04 - Associated Press -- AP -- 

MEXICO CITY - Mexican Air Force pilots filmed 11 unidentified flying objects in the skies over southern Campeche state, a Defense Department spokesman confirmed Tuesday.

A videotape made widely available to the news media on Tuesday shows the bright objects, some sharp
points of light and others like large headlights, moving rapidly in what appears to be a late-evening sky.

The lights were filmed on March 5 (2004) by pilots using infrared equipment. They appeared to be flying
at an altitude of about 3,500 meters (11,480 feet), and allegedly surrounded the Air Force jet as it conducted
routine anti-drug trafficking vigilance in Campeche. Only three of the objects showed up on the plane's radar.

'Was I afraid? Yes. A little afraid because we were facing something that had never happened before,'
said radar operator Lt. German Marin in a taped interview made public Tuesday.

'I couldn't say what it was ... but I think they're completely real,' added Lt. Mario Adrian Vazquez, 
the infrared equipment operator. Vazquez insisted that there was no way to alter the recorded images.

The plane's captain, Maj. Magdaleno Castanon, said the military jets chased the lights 'and I believe they
could feel we were pursuing them.'

When the jets stopped following the objects, they disappeared, he said.

A Defense Department spokesman confirmed Tuesday that the videotape was filmed by members of the Mexican Air Force. The spokesman declined to comment further and spoke on customary condition of anonymity.

The video was first aired on national television Monday night then again at a news conference Tuesday by
Jaime Maussan, a Mexican investigator who has dedicated the past 10 years to studying UFOs.

'This is historic news,' Maussan told reporters. 'Hundreds of videos (of UFOs) exist, but none had the
backing of the armed forces of any country. ... The armed forces don't perpetuate frauds.'

Maussan said Secretary of Defense Gen. Ricardo Vega Garcia gave him the video on April 22. --
 

There is still a controversy about how and why the FLIR's video lights recorded by
Mexican Air Force C26A crew on march 05, 2004 seem to be at the same altitude
as the C26A was at 11,500ft heading East and the camera pointing toward the oil rigs


IMAGE SHOWING A PANORAMIC VIEW OF THE CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX AREA TRYING TO EXPLAIN THE WHOLE
PICTURE OF THE VIDEO EXPERIMENT CONDITIONS AND THE COINCIDENCES BETWEEN THE C-26A FLIR LIGHTS
RECORDED AT 11,500 FT ON A HEADING OF 081º AND CAPT. FRANZ'S VIDEO AT 35,000 FT ON A HEADING OF 252º


YOU CAN SEE THE SIMILARITY OF THE LIGHTS AND THE SCREEN CAPTURES IN THIS  COMPOSED IMAGE  SHOWING AKAL-J AND AKAL-C
OIL RIGS WITH GOOGLE EARTH SATELLITE PICTURES FROM 2006. GOOGLE OIL RIGS COORDINATES AND PICTURES ARE NOT AVAILABLE
ANYMORE DUE TO INTERNATIONAL LAWS AGAINST TERRORISM BECAUSE THEIR POSITION WAS VERY ACCURATE


WE HOPE THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLE COULD HELP YOU TO GET A CLEAR IDEA OF HOW
DISTANT OBJECTS OR LIGHTS ARE SEEN AT THE SAME LEVEL OVER THE EARTH'S HORIZON
FROM AN AIRPLANE'S COCKPIT AT ANY ALTITUDE OR ANY GIVEN FLIGHT LEVEL

SEE THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLE


 
1

Real non edited picture where the
horizon is seen at the same flight level
2

We draw 11 points or lights at the horizon
trying to simulate the FLIR recorded image
3

We simulated that there is less day light and the
lights are still showing in the horizon with no
change in their position but letting the clouds
and part of the pilot's note board in the cockpit
4

We added some "infrared filter" (that really
should be in gray color and not green).
Later we are going to change it to gray
trying to get a better match of the pictures
5

We simulated less daylight letting the distant
lights in sight as much as posible.
6

We simulated that the daylight is almost gone and
let the distant lights still in sight over the horizon
7

We attached the FLIR's screen images to make
a comparison of the image's similarity
Objects located over the earth's surface at a great
distance and closer to the horizon are seen from
the cockpit or windows at the same height or
altitude in a leveled flight
8

We used contrast and changed the picture to a
gray scale color to see the similarity or match.
The lights or objects are seen at the same
level or altitude from the natural horizon from
the airplane's cockpit or windows 

 



Objects located over the earth's surface at a great distance and closer to the horizon are seen
from the airplane's cockpit or windows at the same height or altitude in a leveled flight.

Here is the evidence.

Examples


The Horizon seems to be at the same level                   The Horizon seems to be at the same level


The Horizon seems to be at the same level             The Horizon seems to be at the same level


 The Horizon seems to be at the same level                          The Horizon seems to be at the same level


  The Horizon seems to be at the same level

WE HOPE THAT THE ABOVE EXAMPLE COULD HELP YOU TO GET A CLEAR IDEA OF HOW
DISTANT OBJECTS OR LIGHTS ARE SEEN AT THE SAME LEVEL OVER THE EARTH'S HORIZON
FROM AN AIRPLANE'S COCKPIT OR WINDOWS AT ANY ALTITUDE OR FLIGHT LEVEL


See the latest video of Cantarell oil rigs area recorded on april 14, 2005.
The gas flame lights match and proof the real lights source of the march
05, 2004 FLIR video and is the most convincing evidence till today.

To see the video you need windows media player download here
DOWNLOAD HERE
FREE

MICROSOFT
WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER 10

See Video Here



FLIR frame from video recorded april 14, 2005

Aerial view recorded with a SONY Handycam
Click here or any image to see video


SEE A LIST OF PICTURES FROM
THE VIDEO EXPERIMENT

see HERE the list of still frames from video experiment
of april 14, 2005 . You can also see the oil rig's structures


CLICK HERE for images list

CAMERA USED:
SONY ® HANDYCAM - DCR-TRV18- MINI-DV - DIGITAL ZOOM 120X
LENS: CARL-ZEISS-VARIO-SONNAR


BURNING GAS AT NOHOCH-A OIL PLATFORM
LOCATED IN THE CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX 

     Video caption from FLIR STAR SAFIRE II video lights
        CAMERA WAS POINTING TOWARD CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX

THE FLIR STAR SAFIREII FORM FLIR SYSTEMS WAS NOT WORKING PROPERLY
HERE YOU CAN SEE, HEAR AND READ THE 32 MIN ON BOARD COMMUNICATIONS TRANSCRIPTION


FLIR STAR SAFIREII

WE FOUND SEVERAL SCREEN INDICATIONS OF THE FLIR MALFUNCTION
HERE WE SHOW SOME DISCREPANCIES


The antenna elevation shows above horizon

 Antenna elevation shows -3° below the horizon

 Antenna elevation shows -4°below the horizon

Antenna elevation shows -6° below the horizon 


IF THE MOON WAS VISIBLE THEN THE OIL WELL INFRERED LIGHTS AT
141. NM WERE IN RANGE TO BE CAPTURED BY THE FLIR'S SENSORS
(USE A HORIZON'S DISTANCE CALCULATOR HERE)
LIGHTS HEIGHT +/- 200ft
Airplane altitude 11500ft
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

THE MOON THAT DAY AT SAME TIME WAS 1° 44.526' ABOVE THE HORIZON


STARRY NIGHT PROGRAM SCREEN CAPTURE WITH MOON'S POSITION DATA
THE MOON RISED THAT DAY AT 05:02PM (17:02) SO AT 17:19PM WAS AT 1° 44.526' ABOVE THE HORIZON


WITH THIS INDICATION THE MOON SHOULD HAVE BEEN BELOW THE HORIZON



THE RADAR INSTALLED ON BOARD WAS HAVING DIFFICULTIES
SEE HERE THE FULL VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS TRANSCRIPT


APS-143B(V)3
Console


RADAR INSTALLED ON BOARD THE MEXICAN AIR FORCE C-26A
 


LANDSAT-7 SATELLITE COMPOSITE PHOTO
OF THE OIL WELLS AT CANTARELL
 


LANDSAT-7 SATELLITE PHOTO OF THE OIL WELLS AT CANTARELL
WITH THREE FLIR'S SCREEN CAPTIONS SO WE CAN SEE THEY MATCH CORRECTLY



 
 
Any information hereby given, is the opinion of Tim Wescott, and not necessarily that of FLIR
Systems Inc. Because, although he worked for FLIR Systems for nearly 10 years, he now runs
his own company. See: http://www.wescottdesign.com

Tim Wescott
Senior Systems Engineer. (1994-2003)
FLIR Systems Incorporated,
Portland OR (www.flir.com)
Resume: http://www.wescottdesign.com/tims_resume.html

Tim Wescott was system architect and software lead for FLIR's next generation of thermal
imaging equipment. This effort included selecting the DSP chip used on 12 boards in the
system, designing and coding the data acquisition and control algorithms for lens controllers,
gyros, optical dither stages and focus/field of view mechanisms, working with the mechanical
engineering team to insure the mechanisms will meet the control system goals, and designing
the image processing architecture.

Tim Wescott was control system architect and software lead for the Star SAFIRE II product, 
which features enhanced line-of- sight stability over its predecessor. This effort included
overall control algorithms for the gimbal as well as designing software and critical analog 
components of a DSP-based gyroscope control board that allowed for significantly improved
noise and DC offset performance.

Tim Wescott worked on the control algorithms concerning the gyroscopes, the lenses and the
optical dither stages as well as the FOV/focus mechanism. If anyone knows all there is to know
about the SAFIRE-II is Tim Wescott.

Information regarding the Mexican Air Force FLIR video from march 05, 2004:

Tim Wescott estimates, that the oil flares in question (AKAL-J, AKAL-C and NOHOCH-A)
is detectable by the SAFIRE II on the given distance, due to the size of the flares if the weather
conditions is good. He adds; that the conditions in the FLIR video appeared to be good.

Another thing which is equally interesting is that of the FLIR elevation problems. Gyroscopes
are stabilized with respect to the inertial frame of reference. In this case, we can assume
that it is fixed to the Earth.

However the SAFIRE II has two modes:

One is a hybrid mode where the camera is stabilized against image vibration by the gyros,
but more or less fixed to the aircraft attitude for lower-speed motion. That this is the mode
which is active while these images is shot, is documented in the top-center of the images 
where you can see it says "INRPT", this 'hybrid mode'.

The second mode is denoted as "HDHLD", and this denotes inertially stabilized position
servo mode. In the video, the images in question are shot with respect to the aircraft's
attitude since it is in hybrid mode, but the camera is still stabilized against image vibration
by the gyros.

So the assumptions concerning that the camera must have been relative to the mounting
point on the fuselage, is hereby documented to be correct.

It is common practice for pilots to crank a few degrees of flap so they can cruise a little
slower while keeping the airplane leveled.

Reference source:

JREF Forums-Mexican Airforce films UFOs
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=40244

 

Calculating the C-26A flight path with the FLIR's screen coordinates

The data at the point where two highly luminous lights appeared we can calculate
the distance between the C-26A airplane and the NOHOCH-A oil platform

FLIR COORDINATES AT DIFFERENT INTERVALS:

TIME
Lat
Lon
16:53:04 18 deg 22.03 min 91 deg 21.43 min
16:53:18
18 deg 22.48 min
91 deg 20.55 min
16:56:18
18 deg 22.37 min
91 deg 11.52 min
16:56:28
18 deg 23.05 min
91 deg 10.59 min
17:03:37
18 deg 26.47 min
90 deg 46.51 min
17:03:45
18 deg 26.52 min
90 deg 46.27 min
17:03:57
18 deg 26.54 min
90 deg 45.44 min
17:06:25
18 deg 27.06 min
90 deg 37.24 min
17:07:17
18 deg 28.41 min
90 deg 34.15 min
17:15:18
18 deg 32.04 min
90 deg 06.43 min
17:15:24 
18 deg 32.12 min
90 deg 06.14 min

CALCULATING THE C-26A FLIGHT PATH
 


NOHOCH - A OIL PLATFORM COORDINATES


FLIR SCREEN CAPTION AT 17:03:49 LOCAL TIME (CAMPECHE)

Great Circle Sailing

NOHOCH-A oil platform coordinates
A

B

FLIR coordinates at  17:03:49 Lcl

Great Circle Sailing 
Note: Enter degrees, minutes and decimal minutes or degrees, minutes, seconds and decimal seconds 
Origin (Initial Position) 
Latitude: 
degrees minutes seconds 
Longitude: 
degrees minutes seconds 
Destination (Final Position) 
Latitude: 
degrees minutes seconds 
Longitude: 
degrees minutes seconds 
Results: 
Initial Course :  degrees true 
Great Circle Distance :  nautical miles 


GEOGRAPHIC RANGE CALCULATOR
Geographic Range 
Given the Height of the Object or Light Above Sea Level and the Height of
the Eye of the Observer above Sea Level, Compute the Geographic Range 
Height of the Light or Object above Sea Level
(specify units with no comas): 


feet meters 
Height of the eye of the Observer above Sea Level
(specify units with no comas): 


feet meters
 
                Geographic Range
(Distance to Object or Light):
(Nautical Miles) 

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)
http://www.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/Calculators/range.html



DISCLAIMER

Dr. Julio Herrera posted on sept 28, 2004.
From: Dr. Julio Herrera -herrera@nuclecu.unam.mx-
Date:  September 28, 2004 9:05 am
To:  Cap. Alejandro Franz -director@alcione.org-

Dear Cap. Franz,

I saw your page on the "oil flare hypothesis". I'm thankful that you gave me the
credit on the basis of something that was published at some web page, where
indeed it looks like it's my idea. However, I must clarify that's a misunderstanding
induced by the reporter who wrote the note. I can't tell where the idea originated.
In any case, I recognize this hypothesis may explain many things. What matters by
the end is to find out the true about this affair.

Best regards,
Julio Herrera

P.S.: I'm writing this in English so you may quote me if you wish.

Dr. Julio Herrera
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM
A.P. 70-543, Ciudad Universitaria
Del. Coyoacán, 04511 México, D.F. MEXICO
tel.: +52-55-56224672; FAX: +52-55-56162233
e-mail: herrera@nuclecu.unam.mx
 





COMPELLING AND VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE ABOUT THE STRANGE SIGHTING OF
THE MEXICAN AIR FORCE FLIR VIDEO TAKEN IN A DRUG SMUGGLING CAMPAIGN
ABOARD A C26A ON MARCH 05, 2004 IN THE STATE OF CAMPECHE, MEXICO.



Click on image to view full size

OFFICIAL DATA GATHERED FROM DIFFERENT U.S. GOVERNMENT SOURCES AND
BY THE HARD WORK RESULTS OF OPEN MINDED INVESTIGATORS WHO KINDLY
SUPPORTED MY THEORY CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THAT THE OIL FLARES FROM
THE CANTARELL OIL WELL FIELD MATCH THE LIGHTS OF THE FLIR VIDEO AND THE
GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES FROM THE THE "SONDA DE CAMPECHE" LOCATED
IN THE GULF OF MEXICO IN FRONT OF CIUDAD DEL CARMEN CITY.

THANK YOU TO ALL WHO BELIEVED IN ME AS I BELIEVE THAT IN THE
VAST UNIVERSE INTELLIGENT EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE COULD EXIST

SADLY THERE IS A MAJORITY OF UFO PSEUDO INVESTIGATORS WHO
ARE MAKING BUSINESS AND A CIRCUS WITH NO RESPECT TO HUMANITY

Capt. Alejandro Franz
director@alcione.org



Mexican Air Force C-26 Merlin aircraft

FUERZA AÉREA MEXICANA
MEXICAN AIR FORCE


( CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE )
FIRST IMAGE GENEROUSLY PROVIDED BY JAMES SMITH ( Tue., 08 Jun 2004)
IMAGE SOURCE: http://home.earthlink.net/%7Ebigvideo1/mexicoufo.jpg

THE PATH IS REPRESENTING A 22 MINUTES INTERVAL
THE IMAGE WAS CREATED FROM DATA AVAILABLE AT:
DMSP (Defense Meteorological Satellite Program)

DOWNLOAD SITE: http://dmsp.ngdc.noaa.gov/html/download_world_change_pair.html

Stable lights:
ARCHIVE USED TO EXTRACT DATA OF STABLE LIGHTS
http://dmsp.ngdc.noaa.gov/data/2000_change_pair/2000_stable_lights_version1_TIF.tar

TIFF FORMAT 13 MB COMPRESSED
700 MB UNCOMPRESSED

Stable lights have DN values from 0-63.
These numbers are the average DN values for the year.
Stable lights are the human settlements and gas flares combined.
DN value of 63 = saturated lights
DN value of 0 = no lights.
PROGRAM USED TO VIEW AND LOCATE WORLD'S STABLE LIGHTS

PCI Geomatica FreeView V9.1 
http://www.pcigeomatics.com/product_ind/geomatica_9.html

Geomatica FreeView 9 is a flexible data viewing tool supporting over 100
raster and vector formats for loading, viewing, selection, and enhancement.

FreeView is useful for any geospatial data viewing
application, and it is freely distributable.

FreeView includes a modern interface with many useful display tools,
including fast roam and zoom, image enhancements, numeric values
display, and attribute table display.

To download de installation program archive (25 MB) click here
http://www.pcigeomatics.com/freeware/FreeViewV91.exe


Freeview 9.1 Screen


( CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE )
IMAGE CREATED BY JAMES SMITH WHO KINDLY PROVIDED TO ME
AND HELPED DEFINITELY TO COMPLETE THIS INVESTIGATION

IMAGE SOURCE: http://www.ufocom.org/pages/v_fr/m_articles/video_mexique/Image24.jpg

Chart showing the trajectory followed by Merlin C-26A (black line) since the moment of the first
detection of a radar target (16:42:20) and the end of the observations from the FLIR infra-red data
(17:28:06). The geographical road (in degrees) and the ground speed average (in knots) are given
for the principal segments. The vectors indicate the direction of aiming of infra-red camera FLIR.
(given GPS by Bruce Maccabee) Graph of Laurent Léger (sic) -Gildas Bourdais-
Source: Une observation remarquable au Mexique Par Gildas Bourdais, 1er juin 2004
http://www.ufocom.org/pages/v_fr/m_articles/video_mexique/Mexique_GB.htm



FREEVIEW 9.0 SCREEN SHOWING CANTARELL LIGHT SIZE
COMPARED TO MERIDA CITY WITH A 4 MILLION POPULATION

This graphic shows the Mexican Air Force C26A trajectory from 16:42:20 to 17:28:06 LOCAL TIME
The composite image was created by myself over imposing three images to make this overlay and it shows:

a.-) Primarily (background) the image provided by James Smith.
b.-) The image from Laurent Léger (red vectors) and
c.-) Two of the FLIR's video images vectors that match almost exactly pointing
        to Cantarell Oil Field flares and Campeche City.


Because of an involuntary mistake, I omitted the image bellow from Laurent Léger
received on May 28, 2004 who wrote to me supporting the Cantarell Oil Well theory
and providing some interesting information that I lost because an inappropriate use
of my Netscape email box.

Alejandro Franz



                   Image from Laurent Léger -Cantarell2.JPG - May 28, 2004.


Indexed message received on june 16, 2004 from Laurent Leger 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Laurent Leger" <leger-l@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Gildas Bourdais" <gbourdais@wanadoo.fr>; 
"Bruce Maccabee" <brumac@compuserve.com>; 
"Santiago Yturria"<syturria@intercable.net>; 
<alfafox@prodigy.net.mx>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: Cantarell ?

Dear all,

I used coordinates given for IXTOC I on Alejandro Franz page :
http://www.alcione.org/FAM/REFERENCE_DATA.html

Not so bad match, except the misinterpretation of the Az number
(flir azimuth relative to longitudinal plane axis instead of QDR from 
Cantarell, why would they have input this waypoint ?)

El(evation) figures biased by plane incidence or bad calibration ?
It doesn't explain radar blips, nor the lights seen around -90° later
(full left of plane).

LL

 

 
Subject:      Re: UFOs Or Simply Oil Well Flames?
   Date:       Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:16:42 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
   From:      j smith <zeus001002@earthlink.net>
     To:        "Cap. Alejandro Franz" <alfafox@prodigy.net.mx>

Hello,

I am sending you my latest work.  I thought I would tinker with generating
a 3D image of at least one of the more interesting parts of the video.

I extracted the circa 1997 locations of the oil rigs -from your chart image-
(I would guess more were added between then and now). 

I then placed them in the 3D modeller with the aircraft location at 17:07:00. 

I adjusted the azimuth and elevation until something came into view.

It turns out to be about -140 deg azimuth and -2 deg elevation (down) 
(the video says -139.1 deg and +2 deg elevation (up)).

My modeller doesn't have fine enough resolution to give any better angles. 

I then adjusted the FOV of the camera from the aircraft location to match
the three main values of the FLIR. 

According to Bruce Maccabee, the values are .4 by .3 degree (which he 
says this particular frame was at), .8 by .6 degree and 3.4 by 2.6 degree. 

The match for the oil rigs at 92 by 19.37 degrees, 92.04 by 19.4 deg,
92.07 by 19.425 deg and 92.19 by 19.51 deg is pretty good.

One has to wonder how well the FOV adjustment is calibrated. 

Also, it is clear that this is a pretty extreme zoom mode. 

I also wonder whether they usually use it in their normal operations.

http://home.earthlink.net/%7Ezeus001002/3d_oil.jpg

Regards,
James

IMAGE PROVIDED BY JAMES SMITH
Image source: http://home.earthlink.net/%7Ezeus001002/3d_oil.jpg

IMAGE SHOWING A CLOSE MATCH OF THE FLIR's SCREEN AND THE OIL WELLS
GEOGRAPHIC POSITION RENDERED WITH 3DsMax Rastering&Vectoring PROGRAM


        CANTARELL OIL WELLS  LUMINOSITY  COMPARED TO SOUTHEAST TEXAS OIL WELLS


NOTE:  COORDINATES SHOWN BELLOW ARE FROM NDB'S (NAVAIDS) LOCATED AT MOST OF THE OIL
             WELLS WHICH ARE INSTALLED TO GUIDE HELICOPTERS AND ANY SHIP WHEN APPROACHING
            ANY PARTICULAR OIL RIG.

COORDINATES FROM (NDB 'Navaids') LOCATED AT  EACH OIL WELL:

SOURCE: http://www.wapf.com/world/n.PO1.html ( LINK NOT WORKING ANYMORE)

OIL WELL NAMES LATITUDE LONGITUDE
AKAL J  (PA2) 19 deg 25min 41 sec N 92 deg 04 min 31 sec W
NEPTUNO  (PO1)  19 deg 26min 00 sec N  92 deg 02 min 00 sec W
AKAL C  (PA1)  19 deg 23min 57 sec N 92 deg 02 min 20 sec W
NOHOCH-A  (PN1)   19 deg 22min 06 sec N  92 deg 00 min 14 sec W
NDB:


( CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE )
Image provided by JAMES SMITH
LANDSAT-7 PHOTO OF THE OIL WELLS AT CANTARELL
AKAL-J, AKAL-C AND NOHOCH-A OIL WELLS IMAGE SHOWING NDB'S (NAVAIDS) COORDINATES


SATELLITE IMAGE OF CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX IN THE GULF OF MEXICO
Image from Google Earth captured in 2006 ( now in 2007 is not available anymore)


DISTANCE BETWEEN MAIN GAS BURNERS IN NOHOCH-A COMPLEX
IMAGE GATHERED FROM GOOGLE EARTH IN 2006 ( NOW IN 2007 IS NOT AVAILABLE)


GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES FROM AKAL-C AND NOHOCH-A GAS BURNERS OF
CANTARELL OIL COMPLEX IN THE GULF OF MEXICO. IMAGE WAS GATHERED FROM
GOOGLE EARTH IN 2006 ( NOW IN 2007 IS NOT AVAILABLE ANYMORE)
 


NDB'S (NON DIRECTIONAL BEACONS) AT CANTARELL OIL FIELD
IMAGE FROM 1998 NAVIGATION CHART
ONC J-25 SCALE 1:1,000,000


           CHART ONC J-25 SCALE  1:1,000,000 DATED 1998


NDB'S AT CANTARELL OIL FIELD CHART FROM 1997 ONC J-25 SCALE 1:1,000,000

 
You could find this link useful.

http://mirage-mex.acd.ucar.edu/Literature/2003Villasenor.pdf

Page 4 has a nice diagram of all the platforms in the area.
I guess they did a lot of work gathering location data for all
platforms and flare types.

Diagram
 

Page 6 has the following:

"The three types of offshore flaring operations used either elevated,boom or ground level flares.
Each of the seven major oil and gas producing platform complexes mentioned above may have
one or more elevated flares.

Some vertically pointing flares operate at either high flow (4.2x10^6 m^3/day) or low flow
(9.1 to 24x10^5 m^3/ day).

Several platforms have "boom" flares rated at 2.3x10^5 m^3/day. The designed flows to boom
flaring are generally much higher than the average flows (0.85 to 25x10^5 m^3/day)."
 
 




OIL WELL AKAL-C FLARES AT CANTARELL, CAMPECHE.


IMAGE SHOWING THE LIGHT  (HEAT) INTENSITY OF CANTARELL OIL FIELD AREA
 
CALCULATION CHART
INPUT data in the following chart:

in the "Height of the light above Sea Level"  WINDOW INPUT 200 ft (average elevation of oil rigs booms)

in the "Height above the eye of the observer above sea level" WINDOW INPUT 11500 ft  ( C26A Merlin altitude)

RESULT = 141.89344043992807 NM

Nautical Miles (1nm = 1.852km)

Given the Height of the Light Above Sea Level(200) and the
Height of the Eye of the Observer (11500)above Sea Level,
Compute the Geographic Range
http://pollux.nss.nima.mil/calc/range.html

Height of the Light above
Sea Level (specify units): 
 
feet
meters
Height of the eye of the Observer
above Sea Level (specify units): 
 
feet
meters
Geographic Range:
(Nautical Miles)

IMAGE PROPERTY OF:
UNAM - INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS DEL MAR Y LIMNOLOGÍA
http://biblioweb.dgsca.unam.mx/cienciasdelmar/instituto/1983-1/articulo156.html


IMAGE COMPOSITE BY L.D.G KURT FRANZ RUÍZ

PICTURE SHOWING THE FLIR DIRECTION VECTORS THAT MATCH EXACTLY TO THE CANTARELL OIL FIELD
(CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE )


(CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE )


(CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE )
 


MAGE PROPERTY OF:
UNAM - INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS DEL MAR Y LIMNOLOGÍA
http://biblioweb.dgsca.unam.mx/cienciasdelmar/instituto/1983-1/articulo156.html


Infrared Imagery in Flight

With the aid of advanced imaging sensors, pilots of both rotor craft and fixed wing aircraft
can now conduct missions that were not possible just a few years ago. In general, these
sensors can be viewed as extensions to a pilot's own visual system. They allow the pilot
to safely fly and complete missions at times when environmental conditions (e.g., darkness,
dust, smoke) would preclude flight or mission completion with unaided vision. One class of
imaging sensors that has been used extensively by pilots for targeting, navigation, and flight
control purposes are thermal imaging (infrared imagery) systems. In general, thermal imaging
sensors are sensitive to thermal radiation in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum
(3-5 microns or 8-14 microns). (Visible light, to which the human eye is sensitive, is in the
range of 0.4 to 0.7 microns.)
 

A thermal sensor creates a visual scene on a cathode-ray tube (CRT) that can be mounted either
on the cockpit panel or the pilot's helmet. The visual scene provided by the sensor is monochrome
and appears to be similar to black and white television (TV) or reversed-video (i.e., phase inverted)
black and white TV. However, despite the overall appearance of similarity to TV images, there are
important differences. An important qualitative difference between thermal imagery (TI) and TV or
unaided vision occurs as a direct result of the image's source: The distribution of gray shades in
TI represents relative temperature differences, rather than brightness and reflectance differences.

Compared to TV images or directly-viewed visual scenes,
TI has the following properties:

(1) Heat-emitting objects  generally have higher contrast with the background;
(2) Shadowing/shading information may be absent;
(3) Sensor polarity settings (i.e., the assignment of white or black to hot) may
      lead to perceptual errors;  and
(4) A given object may appear quite different when viewed under different
     environmental  conditions (e.g., time of day, yearly season, humidity, ambient
     temperature).

 These characteristics of thermal imagery directly impact flight
 control and navigation, particularly at very low altitudes:

(1) Pilot workload is generally higher (Hart & Brickner, 1989);
(2) Object distances may be inaccurately estimated (Hart & Brickner, 1989),
      (Hale & Piccione, 1989);
(3) The horizon line may be indistinct (Bohm, 1985); and
(4) Specific objects in the environment may change luminance levels
     drastically as a function of time of day (Berry, Dyer, Park, Sellers & Telton, 1984).

Infrared Imagery in Flight
Dr. David C. Foyle
MS 262-3
Aerospace Human Factors Research Division
NASA Ames Research Center
Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000
http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/ihi/papers/publications/foyle/visualissues91/visualissues91.html


INFRARED AND/OR THERMAL IMAGING

What does a thermal image look like?

A thermal image is black and white. On a relative scale, it shows hot items as white and
cold items as black. Temperatures between the two extremes are shown as gradients of gray.
Some thermal imagers have color images. The color is artificially generated by the camera’s
video enhancement electronics, based upon the thermal attributes seen by the camera.

What is a pixel?

A pixel is the smallest single individual image element of detection on the thermal imaging sensor.

What is a focal plane array (FPA)?

A focal plane array is a group of pixels organized into a rectangular grid. The size of the array is
measured by multiplying the horizontal number of pixels by the vertical number of pixels. Most fire
service thermal imaging cameras on the market today contain 160 x 120 or 320 x 240 FPAs.

What frequency range does the thermal imaging sensor detect?

Thermal imaging sensors are designed to detect long-wave infrared radiation between 8 to 14 microns.
This energy, unlike visible light, can pass through smoke and is undetected by the naked eye.

What is a BST detector?

BST stands for "barium strontium titanate," and this type of detector was developed
by Raytheon Corporation.

Ceramic-like thermal-energy-sensing material is used to make BST focal plane arrays,
which measure heat by storing it as a fixed value (similar to a capacitor) at each pixel.
When the grid of pixels, or focal plane array, is monitored simultaneously, a thermal
image is generated.

Because of their fixed-image properties, BST pixels must be refreshed regularly in order
to maintain the perception of real-time imaging.

The device used to refresh the image is called a "chopper." The "blade" of the chopper
wheel passes in front of the detector to effectively change the scene temperatures "sensed"
with each pass. The speed of the chopper determines the "refresh rate" (see definition)
and is typically 30 Hz.

What is a microbolometer?

A microbolometer is the latest type of thermal imaging FPA, which consists of materials that measure
heat by changing resistance at each pixel. The most common microbolometer material is vanadium oxide
(VOx). Amorphous silicon is another relatively new microbolometer material.

Although microbolometers do not require a chopper to refresh the image, they must occasionally be
recalibrated for the pixels to provide a consistent output and to avoid oversaturation. The device that
occasionally (every 30 seconds to 5 minutes) and automatically recalibrates the FPA is called a
"shutter" (see definition).

What does ferroelectric mean?

A TIC’s detectors that are ferroelectric in nature detect heat by storing it as a value on each individual
pixel. BST and pyroelectric vidicon tubes are examples of ferroelectric detectors.

What does thermoelectric mean?

TIC’s detectors that are thermoelectric in nature detect heat by changing each pixel’s resistance.
Microbolometers are examples of thermoelectric detectors.

What is MRTD?

MRTD stands for Minimum Resolvable Termal Difference. This is a relatively inaccurate
measurement of the smallest temperature difference that a thermal imaging camera can detect.

What is NETD?

NETD stands for Noise-Equivalent Temperature Difference. This is a measurement of the smallest
temperature difference that a thermal imaging camera can detect in the presence of electronic
circuit noise for a particular lens f-number.

What is dynamic range?

Dynamic range is the range of temperature variance that a TIC can see without saturating.
A microbolometer has a much larger dynamic range (e.g., 360º F or 200º C) when compared to a
BST which has a much smaller dynamic range (e.g., 45º F or 25º C). This allows the microbolometer
to demonstrate gradients of gray in environments (generally at higher temperatures) where BST
sensors become saturated and appear as a black and white image.

To further enhance the image, the Evolution 4000 microbolometer automatically extends the dynamic
range even farther to 1080º F (600º C) in high temperatures (indicated by the ‘EI' indicator on display).

What is meant by field of view (FOV)?

The field of view describes the area visible by the thermal imaging camera. FOV is measured in
degrees and can be specified in horizontal, vertical, or diagonal measurement. The lens and its
position generally determine the camera’s FOV.

What is standby mode?

The standby mode turns all major components in a TIC off except for the sensor core. This feature
allows the camera to be in ready mode so that the camera can power up without the standard
15 - to 30-second sensor core warm-up time.

What is the purpose of an iris?

Generally used on ferroelectric (pyroelectric vidicon tubes and BST) sensors, the iris is a mechanical
aperture that operates much like the iris of the human eye. It opens and closes to control the amount
of infrared energy that enters the camera and strikes the sensor.

The iris also manages the "dynamic range" (see definition) of ferroelectric sensors. The iris can be
either manual or automatic and may also be called a "throttle" or "gain adjust." All MSA TICs have
an automatic iris so that operation is completely seamless to the user and requires no manual
intervention.

What thermal imaging cameras currently available on the market are rated as intrinsically safe?

To date, no TICs available on the market have an intrinsic safety rating. Products that are rated as
intrinsically safe do not generate enough heat or spark which could serve as the ignition source for
an explosion.

TICs require too much power and produce too much energy to qualify as intrinsically safe products.
Technology is rapidly evolving to provide lower power components for TICs, so an intrinsically safe
camera is not far away.

What is a shutter?

A shutter is a mechanical device, generally shaped like a flag, which closes in front of the detector
to activate the calibration for a uniform temperature (or black body).

This automatic, periodic calibration is necessary because pixels in microbolometers drift and
cause image degradation.

What is "refresh rate"?

Refresh rate (or frame update rate) is the number of times per second that a new image is "created"
by the sensor. The refresh rate is determined by mechanical attributes (e.g., chopper wheel),
where applicable, and the speed of the electronics.

What is white-out or oversaturation?

White-out or oversaturation occurs when a thermal imaging detector is subjected to too much
thermal energy, and the image, which appears as a white cloud, no longer identifies fine details
in the scene.

Most thermal imaging cameras have an automatic iris or appropriate software to adjust system
controls to avoid white-out immediately after intense thermal energy hits the detector.
Pointing the TIC directly at superheated sources, such as the sun, is not recommended
and may damage the detector.

What makes a quality high-resolution thermal imaging picture?

    Thermal imaging picture quality is determined by a number of factors:

1. The quality of the lens that focuses the thermal image onto the FPA. One measurement of
    lens speed is the f-number. The smaller the f-number, the wider the lens, and the better the
    image quality. Generally, the main constraints to lens quality include weight and size
    (the better the lens, the bigger and heavier it will be).

2. The number of pixels on the FPA. With all other thermal system components being equal,
    the more pixels on the FPA, the finer the image details that can be resolved.

3. Whether it’s microbolometer or BST. BST pixels are mechanically interconnected, whereas
    microbolometer pixels are mechanically isolated. The thermal energy seen by an individual
    BST pixel can therefore "bleed" onto nearby pixels, but isolated microbolometer pixels sense
    independently and provide clearer, crisper image lines.

4. The electronic signal processing (video enhancement electronics). Most fire service thermal
    imaging cameras are controlled by microprocessors, which not only monitor the system but
    also "enhance" the thermal image. For example, some cameras are able to generate near
    320 x 240 FPA performance by using a 160 x 120 array and "averaging" to generate the
    remaining image points. Others are able to determine if a pixel is not functioning properly
    and approximate its correct output using surrounding pixels to generate a smoothed image.

5. The MRTD. ( Minimum Resolvable Termal Difference )

6. The NETD. ( Noise Equivalent Temperature Difference )

7. The Dynamic Range.  In a transmission system, the ratio of the overload level
    ( the maximum signal power that the system can tolerate without distortion of the signal )

8. The amount of system signal noise. Signal processing and components may add noise
    (or "snow") to the image. The cleaner the system, the better the image (difficult to measure
     but easy to see).

9. The display used to interface with the user. The better quality display provides a better image.

Source: http://www.msanet.com/MSANorthAmerica/MSAUnitedStates/frequentlyaskedquestions/EvolutionFAQ.html


LOOMING MIRAGE


Mexico's FLIR video screen shot showing two lights with a lower anomaly.
It looks like a LOOMING MIRAGE

A second effect, called refraction, also affects the path the electromagnetic energy will take
as it propagates through the atmosphere. Normally, because the atmosphere's density
decreases rapidly with height, the radar beam will be deflected downward, much like light
passing through a glass prism. In extreme cases, where temperature increases with height
and dry air overlays warm air, (a condition often found along coastlines), the beam can bend
down dramatically and even strike the ground. Meteorologists call this effect "anomalous
propagation". Both the curvature of the earth and normal atmospheric refraction must be
accounted for when determining the position of a target.

Refraction : The bending of light

The bending of light as it passes from one medium to another is called refraction.

The angle and wavelength at which the light enters a substance and the density of that
substance determine how much the light is refracted. The refraction of light by atmospheric
particles can result in a number of beautiful optical effects like halos, which are produced
when sunlight (or moonlight) is refracted by the pencil shaped ice crystals of cirrostratus clouds.

A mirage is an optical phenomenon which often occurs naturally. The kind most commonly
seen is produced by the refraction of light when it passes into a layer of warm air lying close
to a heated ground surface.  ( Like the sea waters in the Gulf of Mexico before down )

A mirage effect produced by greater-than-normal refraction in the lower atmosphere,
thus permitting objects to be seen that are usually below the horizon. This occurs when
the air density decreases more rapidly with height than in the normal atmosphere.
If the rate of decrease of density with height is greater in the region followed by the ray
from the top of the object than for the ray from the bottom of the object, the image will
be stretched vertically. This stretching is often called looming but is more properly
termed towering. The antonym of looming is sinking and that of towering is stooping.

Some mirages have specific names:

1. Looming - appearance of objects usually hidden below the horizon. Normally occur over
    water surfaces when normal rate of air thickness decreases and altitude is heightened.

2. Sinking - reverse effect of the above phenomenon. Occurs when the opposite conditions
    at sea take place. In sinking, the vessels, boats and shorelines which are seen on the
    horizon, seem to sink below and become invisible.

3. Towering - occurs due to irregular refraction. Light rays curve downward, with the top
     of the object curving more than the lower ones. The observer will see objects which seem
     to be lifted up more then they need to be and will be enlarged in the vertical direction.

4. Stooping - when the light rays of the distant object curve downward less than the rays at
    the bottom. This vertical contraction gives it this name. It results in objects on the horizon
    being observed with the rising or setting of the sun and the moon. One may often see a
    distortion caused by irregular layer effects of the lower atmosphere strata. One of the most
    famous of these occurs between Calabria and Sicily and is known as Fata Morgana.

Normal atmospheric conditions

Usually, within the lower atmosphere (the troposphere) the air near the surface of the Earth
is warmer than the air above it, largely because the atmosphere is heated from below by
solar radiation absorbed at the surface.

Hot air, however, rises. This is convection in which the warmer air rises up, to be replaced
with cooler air which is then heated. It is this process that leads to cloud building, thermals,
and other convection related atmospheric behavior.

Inversion layer

How inversions occur

Sometimes the gradient is inverted, so that the air gets colder nearer the surface of the Earth:
this is a temperature inversion.

It can be created by the movement of air masses of different temperature moving over each
other. A warm air mass moving over a colder one can "shut off" the convection effects,
keeping the cooler air mass trapped below.

It commonly occurs at night: when solar heating ceases, the surface cools by radiation,
and cools the immediately overlying atmosphere. Over most of Antarctica there is a near
permanent inversion.

Consequences of an Inversion

With the disruption of normal convection, a number of phenomena are associated
with a temperature inversion. One common effect is the general "stillness" of the air,
as is dirty or foggy air which can no longer be pulled away from the surface.

The Index Refraction of air decreases as the air temperature increases, a side effect
of hotter air being less dense. Normally this results in distant objects being shortened
vertically, an effect that is easy to see at sunset (where the sun is "squished" into an orb).
In an inversion the normal pattern is reversed, and distant objects are instead stretched
out or appear to be above the horizon. This leads to the interesting optical effects of
Fata Morgana or mirage.

Inferior mirage

What is a mirage? A mirage is a misleading appearance. Most mirages occur on
the seas or in the deserts. What will cause a mirage? A reflection. What causes
reflection? Light. We seldom consider light as anything magical or wonderful,
but light allows us the ability to see many good things and, often, many bad things.

Mirages, also called illusions, are caused by a reflection of some distance object
which allows you to think that it is close by. In physics, it is known as an optical
illusion. The more common type of mirage is called inferior mirage. It happens
when a refraction of light passes through the atmosphere layers with varying
qualities. Distance objects may seem to be raised above or below their normal
locality. These objects may be seen as irregular and fantastic shapes.

In warmer climates, such as deserts and sandy plains, mirages frequently occur.
It normally comes in the appearance of the desert resembling a sheet of water,
especially if you are somewhat higher than the mirage you experience. If you've
been driving down the interstate in the heat of summer, you probably have
noticed this same effect. With this case, the image is really of the sky.
How does it occur? If you are below eye level of this surface, all objects will
appear inverted, or upside-down. Over a hot surface, air will stand in layers
that are of a different element or part. The layers below or near the ground
are the hottest. These air layers cause a distortion of wave fronts, due to the
speed of light varying as the element or parts change.

Superior mirages are spectacular events, but much less common than the
inferior mirage. These occur mainly over the horizon of the sea when distant
objects are sketched, or drawn, upside down in the sky. Sometimes there is
an erect image of the same object which will be above the upside-down image.
This is characteristic of cold areas and conditions with a strong change of